0.6mm Tool for FUE

Hello or “Hej” – as we say in Sweden.

I did read a post from you talking about FUE instruments, you use 0.9mm and smaller tools will cause greater follicular holocaust, you said.

Recently I did read a blog entry from you where you talked about FUE and the development of smaller tools.

I’m confused. Here in Sweden we have an intresting option, 0.6mm. Is this pure nonsense or could this surgeon be that good? Method is called “FUE plus” and is said to transplant 120-180 hairs / cm2.

I did notice that you said that 200 hairs / cm2 is the original density provided by the “man above”.

Why increased follicular holocaust when using smaller instruments?

I am hopeful that some breakthrough will come about that will allow smaller instruments to be used, but alas I have not seen them yet. Without knowing the doctor who proclaims such miraculous instruments, as a betting man, I would wager that some lack of proper representation is the case here. Add to such a wonderful instrument, the ability to achieve within 90% of God density and you have FUE God Plus. That means that some doctors can improve on what God might do if he (or she, depending on your beliefs) was a transplant surgeon here on earth.