WRassman,M.D. BaldingBlog
    • Menu

    Pudendal Neuropathy and Propecia

    Nov 18, 2011/by William Rassman, M.D./8 /Diseases, Drugs, Favorites

    I read on one post that Propecia caused someone to have pudendal neuropathy which caused both sensory and motor dysfunction in the genital tissues. Is this a Post-Finasteride-Syndrome? Is pudendal neuropathy a side effect?

    The term “neuropathy” means damage to a nerve… so “pudendal neuropathy” is damage to the pudendal nerve. I cannot imagine how Propecia can cause damage to this specific nerve. Damage to the nerve is usually from mechanical injury (bike riding, falling on your buttocks, etc) or inflammatory issues (infection) or chronic medical conditions that damage your nerve, such as diabetes or multiple sclerosis. Propecia is a drug that that partially blocks the conversion of testosterone to DHT. If someone is going to claim that there is some special DHT relationship to a pudendal nerve, we might as well be blaming Propecia for our economy or the color of the sky.

    Stating that a drug (Propecia) caused a neuropathy to the pudendal nerve is questionable, because there is no difference in the pudendal nerve to a nerve that innervates your thumb. The pudendal nerve is one of many nerves in your pelvic area (for both men and women) and one segment of it innervates your penis or clitoris. I believe many readers may have heard of sciatica when doctors refer to certain back pain caused by the sciatic nerve. The pudendal nerve is a distal branch of a sciatic nerve. Patients with back problems or pelvic area problems/trauma/tumor/etc can have pudendal nerve issues. Pudendal nerve damage can cause erection problems, but it will also cause perineal numbness or pain (see here).

    If there is an erection issue, the most simple test is a nocturnal penile tumescence (NPT) test. Imagine a roll of stamps wrapped around a flaccid penis and taped. If you get an erection, the stamps will stretch and break at the perforations. I assume there are better devices out there and better tests, but this test can sometimes be a good starting point to help delineate if erectile issues are psychological or physical. Normally, men will have involuntary erections during sleep (aka “morning wood”). It would be interesting to see if the 70 or so men that reported permanent erection problems can achieve nocturnal (involuntary) erections and if they ever underwent these tests, But from my reading I believe the erection issues were self-reported and no subjective testing was performed.

    In matters of medical health, the Internet is not a place to self diagnose medical conditions or become armchair physicians. But alas, it is what many readers will continue to do and the urban legends will propagate.

    Tags: propecia, finasteride, dht, nerve damage, pudendal neuropathy

    High Grade Cancers, Propecia, and Avodart

    Apr 23, 2010/by William Rassman, M.D./0 /Drugs, Favorites, Other, Tidbits

    Hi, I was reading an article yesterday that mentions Propecia and Avodart and tumor growth. I’ll put the link below. I’m currently taking Propecia and I want to know if I have anything to be concerned about? Thanks!

    Article: Avodart may promote some tumor growth

    AvodartSometimes its hard to decipher research and its conclusions especially when there is controversy. The news you are referring to is from a recently published study in the April 2010 New England Journal of Medicine (a respected medical journal). Its conclusion was, “Over the course of the 4-year study period, dutasteride reduced the risk of incident prostate cancer detected on biopsy and improved the outcomes related to benign prostatic hyperplasia.” This is good.

    The confusion is in the news article spin-off you found of other doctors giving their opinions and commentaries. The significance of this article is that now Avodart (dutasteride) has been shown to reduce the risk of incident prostate cancer similar to what was shown in the Proscar (finasteride 5mg) study, which was published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2003.

    Despite the apparent positive findings, there were controversies due to interpretation of the studies where some thought Proscar may be delaying aggressive prostate cancer from being detected. To address this, the National Cancer Institute published a bulletin in 2006 which stated, “We’ve now shown that the cancers prevented by finasteride are often clinically significant, the same kind of cancers that lead to surgery. In addition, we showed a 28 percent reduction of high-grade cancer with finasteride.”

    Remember, these are positive findings for Proscar and now Avodart. Also note that these studies are not about Propecia (finasteride 1mg), and while the inference is there, you cannot make a claim that taking the 1mg dose will have the same impact on the reduction of prostate cancer risk.

    So to answer your question more simply — no, I do not think you have anything to be concerned about based on this information.

    Tags: proscar, avodart, finasteride, dutasteride, propecia, hairloss, hair loss, cancer, tumor, prostate

    Alternative Hair Therapies Are Worthless

    Dec 30, 2009/by William Rassman, M.D./0 /Favorites, Hair Products

    Note: I’ve received quite a bit of negative feedback about my views on the various hair lotions and potions that are for sale and while I take it in stride, I received this great post from a longtime reader. He’s contributed some fine posts about hair lasers and the FDA in the past, and really, his post below sums up my thoughts on the issue:

    Post by Guest Writer

      Worthless hair productsI am a physician, scientist, patient, and someone who has brought several therapies for life-threatening diseases to market via my work in the biotechnology industry. I enjoy your blog. In response to posts oddly critical of your views of “Propecia, Merck, and the FDA”, I wish to add some unsolicited comments.

      Occasional readers take you to task for their perception that you discredit alternate therapies. You do nothing of the sort. You simply ask, “What is the evidence for Product X’s safety and effectiveness?” To some, hearing someone say something wonderful about Product A is adequate. Unfortunately, the history of medicine is full of examples of useless products (and invasive, unsafe therapies), which fortunately have fallen out of favor after being subjected to rigorous, lengthy, and costly scientific scrutiny where adequate comparison groups (placebo) and other controls are used.

      In general, alternate hair therapies are worthless and little evidence exists showing any effectiveness. Because many of these therapies are made of natural substances, they do not qualify as drugs and fall outside of the realm of the FDA (where unsupported claims of drugs can not be made without penalty). Unlike these bogus products, where there is no evidence to support their value, drug manufacturers make the summary data on the thousands of patients that underwent clinical trials supporting approval of a drug publicly available (See Drugs@FDA).

      Your readers who fret about some undeclared and irreversible side effect occurring years from now for a drug can make their own decision after reading the studies that go into their approval (and supplemental postmarketing safety info). No such data exists to make informed decisions about these “alternative” therapies. And, before hearing “conspiracy theories” about how the FDA is financially beholden to drug companies, the reality is that scientists who develop therapies over many years are salaried and make no additional money based on the success of development (although obviously the drug company does). Do you think the health care proponents of alternative therapies are similarly financially removed?

    Tags: hairloss, hair loss, alternative, fda, pharmaceutical, natural

    Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) Patient Guide

    Oct 3, 2008/by William Rassman, M.D./0 /Favorites, FUE, Hair Transplantation

    Dr. William RassmanI wanted to call your attention to yesterday’s announcement relating to follicular unit extraction (FUE). As the ‘inventors’ of the procedure, publishing the first authoritative article in the Journal of Dermatologic Surgery in 2002, I have taken a keen interest in the way this procedure is delivered throughout the world. Much of what I have been observing has been disturbing. Too many doctors with little experience, and skills that have not been refined, have entered the field with heavy marketing programs offering FUE. My experience, however, has shown that some patients are not good candidates for this procedure and damage to the harvested grafts can be substantial in most surgeon’s hands. The key here is graft yield and unfortunately, this is an assessment made either after the procedure is performed with careful surgical monitoring and record keeping (by recording hair damage within each graft), or 8 months after the procedure when the patient can judge the success or failure of the results on his or her head.

    I realize there is a delicate balance between what we want and what we buy. Our progress in reinventing the FUE process is discussed here — new FUE breakthrough. I really hope everyone considering having an FUE surgery (or anyone just curious about how it works) will read our new guide to evaluating Follicular Unit Extraction Techniques.

    So what prompted me to write a new FUE guide? A while ago, I had the opportunity to view a well known doctor extract approximately 20 FUE grafts under my direct observation. While he boasted that he had mastered the procedure, what I saw reflected far less than such mastery and the doctor obtained a significant transection/amputation rate of the hairs in the graft. That doctor is prominently offering FUE today.

    The surgeon’s technical skills take years to acquire and perfect, and although there are now some very fine doctors who I believe have truly mastered the technique and can deliver a quality service, I believe that they are in the minority of those offering it. There is a substantial worldwide demand for this minimally invasive hair transplant (virtually painless during the post-operative period, the patient can return to full activities in a week including all types of exercises, and there is no linear scarring). The problem for the patient, however, is in selecting a doctor where the FUE technique does not produce a “follicular holocaust” causing a substantial loss of donor hair and a failure of the procedure. This insight seems to be hidden from most buyers, because prospective patients want to believe in the marketing hype that is prevalent on the Internet and they are sold the technique by professional marketing pitches. There is no way to determine in advance, the skills of the doctors offering to perform the surgery.

    In our new FUE guide, we have defined a way for patients to examine the various doctors offering this procedure, giving them an idea of what questions to ask and what things to look for. There is no site to offer guidance in the doctor selection process so the consumer must arm himself with the knowledge and skills to make the proper judgments themselves. Hopefully, our writings will appropriately arm the readers interested in this technique.

    • Article link: Patient’s Guide to Follicular Unit Extraction
    Tags: follicular unit extraction, fue, hair transplant, hairtransplant, hairloss, hair loss

    Dr Rassman Named Pioneer of the Month by ISHRS

    Feb 8, 2008/by William Rassman, M.D./1 /Favorites, Other

    Hair Transplant Forum International is the official publication of the International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery (ISHRS), and I’m pleased to announced that I was just named the Pioneer of the Month (Volume 18, Number 1)! The article, written by Dr. Jerry Cooley, is presented below. It serves as part biographical, part information that hasn’t been found elsewhere on the Internet until now. I hope it gives you an insight into my background and goals for the future.

    —

    William Rassman, MDAs a young man, Bill Rassman had “one focus in life, to make a difference.” To say he’s made a difference to the specialty of hair restoration may be one of the greatest understatements ever. Creative and controversial, Bill has made his mark and it’s hard to imagine how hair transplantation would have evolved without him. Because of Bill, our lives are very different indeed.

    Bill was born in 1942 in New York. He grew up in Brooklyn, the son of Russian immigrants. After medical school in Virginia, he entered general surgery residency at the University of Minnesota and Cornell. This was interrupted by military service in Viet Nam. Before military service, he did a cardiovascular fellowship where he played a key role in pioneering and commercializing the intra-aortic balloon pump. After returning, he finished his surgery residency at Dartmouth. Bill entered private practice in Vermont where he practiced for six years. He then relocated to Hawaii, practicing surgery there for four years.

    Feeling bored and in need of adventure, Bill left medicine and became an entrepreneur, starting a company that developed commercial applications for windmills. After this became a multi-million dollar business, he sold the company. With the money he made, Bill funded his next adventure, a start-up computer software company, which did not progress the way he wanted. After four years of working to develop this, he decided to reenter medicine.

    ISHRSBill joined Bosley where he soon became its president. Unhappy with the state of hair transplantation at that time, he left Bosley and in 1991 began visiting prominent surgeons, such as Walter Unger and Emmanual Merritt. During this time, he developed his ideas about procedures with large numbers of small grafts, the “megasession.” Bill began doing hair transplants, which in the beginning meant only 400-500 grafts where he did all the cutting and placing himself.

    With increasing staff came increasing session sizes. More staff also allowed Bill to focus on further innovations, such as the Densitometer to quantify donor hair and help estimate the number of grafts that could be harvested. It also allowed him to open more offices, including one in New York where he met Bob Bernstein. Together, they developed the concept of using naturally occurring follicular units as the fundamental building block of hair transplantation.

    In the mid-90s, Bill’s practice was booming and he was very busy. One issue that became obvious in the “megasession” era was the dependence on large numbers of well-trained staff. To give the surgeon more control over the procedure, Bill began experimenting with follicular unit extraction and new tools to automate the procedure. His interest in FUE continues and he reports that he may introduce a new tool that “reflects a completely new paradigm” for FUE. His interest in automation led to the development of the Carousel Implanter (1997), and instrument he still thinks works great. Unfortunately, he was unsuccessful getting a company to manufacture a reliable instrument.

    Bill’s current activities include maintaining his Balding Blog on the Internet, he he daily gets 5,000 visitors and 700 emails. Bill also enjoys writing and is currently working on a book entitled “Hair Loss for Dummies,” which is part of the popular consumer book series.

    Another current interest is completely outside the field of hair restoration. Bill is founder of a company (Maven Technologies) focused on “personalized medicine,” with proprietary technology used in a diagnostic instrument to rapidly assay thousands of abnormal proteins, glycoproteins, and disease markers in patients for early disease detection and staging. Eventually, he hopes that this technology will become a backbone instrument used by pharma for the development and testing of new drugs. He refers to this project as one of the most exciting things he’s ever done, which is quite a statement in light of all his career accomplishments.

    When he has free time, Bill likes to scuba, ski, read, and compose music on the piano, as well as spend time with his four grown children.

    Tags: rassman, pioneer, ishrs, forum, hairloss, hair loss, hair transplant, hairtransplant, doctor, award

    Actor Joe Penny Shows Off His Repaired Hairline (with Photos)

    Feb 1, 2008/by William Rassman, M.D./22 /Favorites, Hair Transplantation, Hairlines, Photos, Repair

    Joe Penny, perhaps best known for his starring roles in hit 1980s television series Riptide and Jake and the Fatman or more recently his guest spot on the popular TV show CSI: Crime Scene Investigations and the Hallmark Channel’s Jane Doe TV movies, has agreed to let me show his results from a repair job started years back. Due to a variety of professional obligations, we were unable to schedule more work until about a year ago. When his old, ugly plugs from another doctor showed, I was reluctant for him to tell people that I was his doctor (even if only for repairs, because I did not finish the repair job)… but now things are very different as these two month old pictures show.

    He tells me that on many occasions he’s overheard fellow actors talking about hair transplants, expressing fear of taking charge and doing something about their thinning hair. As Joe puts it, “It takes a great deal of courage to make the decision to get a hair transplant, especially when you see so many bad jobs out there in Hollywood. You get gun shy after making a bad decision and it took me some time to make the decision to fix my bad hair job. But now, when people talk about a hair transplant for their balding and struggle with the hair loss problem, they don’t look at me as an expert any more”.

    Update 2/1/08 6:00 pm:

    Joe just wrote to me. He did not know that I put him on the blog today, even though he gave me permission to do this over a month ago. This is what he said: “I want to thank you again for your kindness and your generosity in my case. The last procedure I had..even after seeing you a couple of months ago..has still continued to grow and thicken. Also the donor area…because of the expert surgical job you did… is so loose I cannot believe it! It is truly astounding to me. I mean…I new you were good but WOW! The results speaks louder than words. I have recommended several people to come and see you. I know that some of them have already come. They called me and were very angry at me, meaning…well the dialogue went something like this…”Why the hell didn’t you tell me about the NEW HAIR INSTITUTE BEFORE” My response was “I DID…YOU WERE NOT LISTENING”. They are extremely satisfied, as I have been for years. So I will keep spreading the word about the fantastic work you and you Doctors are doing at NHI.

    After I received this email, I wrote to him asking for permission to use the above email. His response came in at 9:00pm and this is what he said: “Yes, you have my absolute permission to post my email. Please consider this communication as my acknowledgment that it is absolutely OK with me to post it. Not a problem Dr. Rassman. If there is a group oif men or if there is an open house going on at the office with people who are considering it and might feel a little shy or afraid of a surgery, just let me know and IF I, AM…AND IN TOWN….I WILL DO MY BEST TO ATTEND AT AN OPEN HOUSE!

    Thanks You Doc,

    Sincerely,

    Your fan forever, Joe Penny
    God Bless You And Keep You

    Joe is not atypical for someone who has gone through a type of hell with the old type of hair transplant plugs done years ago. I am absolutely humbled by his comments. For as long as I have been in this industry, I have been pleased to be able to help men like Joe and there have been hundreds of them, but it is even better to put hair back on a new patient who would never have to experience Joe’s type of pain.

    Click photos to enlarge.

    After repair:

     

    Before repair (scanned photos):

     

    Tags: actor, hollywood, celebrity, csi, joe penny, hairloss, hair loss, hairtransplant, hair transplant, repair, plugs, photos

    Propecia Gave Me Side Effects — How Can I Get My Sex Drive Back?

    Jan 28, 2008/by William Rassman, M.D./0 /Drugs, Favorites

    I am concerned about the loss of sex drive from taking propecia. I took propecia for about 6 months and my sex drive was non existant. I stopped taking it over a year ago and it has returned, some what, but not nearly where it was before. Is there a product that will help it return, or anything that can be done? I would rather be bald with a strong sex drive, than a head full of hair without one.

    Sex driveYou need to go see your doctor for a physical examination and possible testing. While Propecia can cause a decreased sex drive (in 1 to 2% of men), it is temporary since the drug only lasts in your blood stream for about one day. After one year, I hardy doubt your sexual problem is due to Propecia. You need to see a doctor for further evaluation. In fact, erectile dysfunction may be one of the first signs of an underlying medical problem.

    Here are a few facts about sex drive / erectile dysfunction / impotence that I found at Minnesota Men’s Health Center:

    • One in 10 men (10%) in the world have erectile dysfunction.
    • 30 million men in the United States have erectile dysfunction.
    • 50% of men with diabetes have erectile dysfunction, frequently within 10 years of diagnosis.
    • The likelihood of erectile dysfunction increases with age: 39% at age 40, 65% over the age of 65.
    • Smokers have a higher likelihood of erectile dysfunction.
    • Men who smoke more than 1 pack per day have a 50% higher chance of impotency than nonsmokers the same age.

    And from the Mayo Clinic:

    Nonphysical causes:

    • Psychological problems. The most common nonphysical causes are stress, anxiety and fatigue. Impotence is also an occasional side effect of psychological problems such as depression.
    • Negative feelings. Feelings that you express toward your sexual partner — or that are expressed by your sexual partner — such as resentment, hostility or lack of interest also can be a factor in erectile dysfunction.

    Physical causes:

    • Nerve damage from longstanding diabetes (diabetic neuropathy)
    • Cardiovascular disorders affecting the blood supply to the pelvis
    • Certain prescription medications
    • Operations for cancer of the prostate
    • Fractures that injure the spinal cord
    • Multiple sclerosis
    • Hormonal disorders
    • Alcoholism and other forms of drug abuse

    The physical and nonphysical causes of erectile dysfunction commonly interact. For instance, a minor physical problem that slows sexual response may cause anxiety about attaining an erection. Then the anxiety can worsen your erectile dysfunction.

    Tags: hairloss, hair loss, sex drive, side effect, ed, erectile dysfunction, propecia, finasteride

    Can You Dismiss Propecia Information on the Web?

    Jan 11, 2008/by William Rassman, M.D./1 /Drugs, Favorites

    Dear Dr. Rassman,

    I have heard from people on the Internet, especially from the following two websites, that the sexual side effects of Propecia can be permanent, along with many others. Can you dismiss all the information on these websites?

    propeciasideeffects.com and propeciahelp.com

    MegaphoneAnyone can write and publish anything on the Internet. You can you find contrary evidence to those sites you listed at Propecia.com. I can’t dismiss everything on these anti-Propecia/finasteride websites, because I simply don’t have time to go through every post made there. I’m sure some of the claims made there are based in fact and might have some validity — and those have more than likely been addressed here before (search for “Propecia side effects”). I’m also sure that much of the info on those sites is created by people that have no medical background and simply write what they believe to be true based on FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt).

    The people that speak the loudest are usually the people that want their complaints to be heard. In other words, you don’t necessarily see a lot of people visiting message boards just to tell others that Propecia works great for them, but you certainly will see the unsatisfied few going to every website they can find to make their opinions known. When doing your research online, try to find out if you’re getting information from fact-based sources. Are these other sites just shills for the various snake oil products on the market today? What better reason to shoot down a proven treatment like Propecia than to promote your non-proven treatment that sells for double the price. I’m not saying that this is 100% the case, but anything is possible. Take BaldingBlog (this very site), for example — I’m a hair transplant surgeon, yet I’m not trying to “sell” people on hair transplantation procedures. I write a lot about Propecia because I get asked a lot about Propecia, and because I’ve seen first hand what this medication can do to treat hair loss. I don’t want to see anyone go through an unnecessary surgery when a simple daily pill could be the answer to their problem. I, along with the other doctors that write here, are just trying to help.

    It seems what you really want is a doctor’s reassurance. Although I am a doctor, I am not your doctor… and you need to discuss these concerns with your doctor. You may not even be a candidate for Propecia.

    Tags: propecia, finasteride, hairloss, hair loss, forum, boards, proscar, website, doctor, internet, fud

    BX3.4 Hair Helmet

    Nov 29, 2007/by William Rassman, M.D./1 /Favorites, Hair Products

    Hi Dr Rassman

    I have read your blog for some time and find it an oasis of sensible, factual information in the desert of hair loss websites.

    I am writing to you to ask about the BX 3.4 helmet. I know you have mentioned it before but I wanted to draw your attention to a paper written by Dr Tony Chu, a consultant dermatologist in the UK. I have seen Dr Chu for years for my acne and he has managed it amazingly well, and he pioneered a laser therapy for acne which he proved with rigorous studies and research.

    When I mentioned my (minimal) hair loss to him, he alerted me to the BX 3.4 helmet, and I did some research. I found a paper he wrote somewhere on the internet, to the UK Advertising Standards Authority, pulling together all the various studies and research on the subject of electromagnetic treatment of hair loss. IT looked very persuasive to me as a layman, and suggested room for further studies. I can’t find the paper now, which is annoying, but know it exists.

    What are your thoughts? Have you seen the paper he wrote? If not, do you have some way of getting it and looking at it? If not, are you aware of all the studies he cited concerning this subject, and what are your thoughts on them?

    I did buy the helmet from ebay at greatly reduced cost (£750 is a lot of money) and it does *seem* an insane idea to me, but then so did laser therapy for my long standing acne problem, and that worked, so I never like to say never.

    Thanks

    HelmetI’ve received a few emails over the past year and a half about this BX 3.4 helmet, and as I wrote before, there is no science that I can see behind claims that electromagnetic waves can have a positive impact on hair regrowth. I was just reading on their website that this helmet requires a monthly purchase of “essential oils” from the helmet maker, although the prices aren’t listed. What are these magic hair-regrowing oils, you wonder? The site lists Bay Saint-Thomas, Laurel leaf, Rosemary, Patchouli, Thyme Borneol, Cedar, Sage, Clary Sage, Myrtle, and Ylang-Ylang. So there’s extra costs on top of the nearly $1500 hair helmet.

    A number of years ago, a professor from one of the local universities had developed electromagnetic treatments for diabetic ulcers of the legs and suggested that there was some data indicating an application for bringing back hair in a situation where hair loss occurred. The work to find out if it would work would’ve been an enormous task (and one which I just didn’t have time for), so I decided to pass on an opportunity to get involved to determine the value of this treatment modality.

    As many regular readers of this site will probably know, I am a skeptic of most of the new treatments for hair loss, as most of them are not based on science, but motivated by commercial and monetary gain. I have not read Dr. Chu’s paper (I looked for it online and was unsuccessful), but since you’ve purchased one of these helmets, I’m guessing that you believe in it. Please keep us informed of your progress.

    Consumers spend collectively millions, if not billions, of dollars on products for that allusive hair loss cure and as long as we are willing to spend the money simply to “give it a shot”, these products (including this electromagnetic helmet) will continue to entice people. I suppose the reasoning is that if the price is right, it may be worth the gamble, and to many people, the price of hair has no limit. On the other hand, the savvy entrepreneurs will keep selling these products for the “right” price and make their fortune.

    Note: Image is for illustrative (and humor) purposes only. This is not the actual BX3.4 helmet.

    Tags: bx34, hairloss, hair loss, helmet, electromagnetic, electromagnet, magnet, bx3-4, bx3

    With the Death of Kanye West’s Mom After Plastic Surgery, I Wonder How Dangerous a Hair Transplant Is?

    Nov 16, 2007/by William Rassman, M.D./0 /Favorites, Hair Transplantation

    How dangerous is a hair transplant? The news about Kayne West’s mom dying after surgery has me scared. What happened to her and could it happen to me after surgery?

    Kanye West, Donda WestThis is certainly a big news story this week, but for those that haven’t followed it, please read the following links:

    • CNN – Autopsy planned for Kanye West’s mom
    • Wired – American Academy of Cosmetic Surgery President Discusses Kanye West’s Mom’s Death

    What is there to say that the above references did not already say? Crossing the street can put you at risk of death, but the risks will go up if you’re running across the street with your eyes closed. Good planning, thorough research and common sense is central to the lessons here.

    The presence of heart disease, by itself, may not be a contraindication for elective cosmetic surgery, but the heart disease risks must be defined and appropriate steps must be taken to minimized these risks. I have done surgery over my career on many patients with heart disease and these surgeries were done safely. Clearly from the references here, there is a strong suggestion that these risks were not defined for Donda West’s heart condition.

    The doctor is ultimately responsible not to do surgery when risks have not been mitigated. I would ask if there was a rush to the surgery. Decisions that are made before surgery, during anesthesia, and even after the surgery is completed, account for most of the risks. Donda West doctor’s legal problems (medical board history, history of DUIs, and court appearances for malpractice) are suggestive of a problem for this doctor. It has been reported that the plastic surgery (tummy tuck and breast reduction) was performed by Dr. Jan Adams, who is probably best known as the host of the Discovery Health channel’s show Plastic Surgery: Before and After, or from his appearance on the Oprah show, or even from when he co-hosted a daytime talk show with Dick Clark a few years back. So here we have a doctor performing cosmetic surgery that has been on TV for a number of years and is known to many viewers. Does he promote himself as a “Doctor to the Stars” due to his Hollywood connections? Did Kanye West’s mother research the doctor’s history and credentials adequately? Did she have heart disease and if she did, was it adequately evaluated. I don’t know the answers to these questions.

    To my knowledge, there has been only one death from a hair transplant anywhere in North America, as previously reported (see Death During Hair Transplant Surgery). This death reflects what appears to be completely incompetent medical care. The clinic where this death occurred, known for bargain basement prices, is still performing surgery and it appears that the patients that go there do not focus on risks of death or complications from a hair transplant or they would not be so popular. One might ask those who continue to even consider this place for surgery, “Why try to save a few dollars and place your life on the line?”

    Tags: kanye west, kanye, donda west, donda, hairtransplant, hair transplant, jan adams, doctor, physician, plastic surgery, surgeon, danger

    Chest Pain, Indigestion, and Outpatient Surgery

    Nov 6, 2007/by William Rassman, M.D./0 /Favorites, Other

    HeartYesterday, I received some sad news when I learned about the passing of one of our hair transplant patients just 5 months after his procedure. He had complained to his local doctor about chest pain and was told that it just was indigestion. This patient complained a number of times about the chest pain to his physician and each time he was tagged with the diagnosis of reflux. He recently had a heart attack and died.

    Although the outcome was different, this reminded me of a similar case that I wanted to share. A female hair transplant patient had complained of periodic chest pain when I took her medical history. It sounded like cardiac pain (angina), so I had her see her doctor. He took an electrocardiogram (ECG — also known as an EKG) and told her that the pain was reflux (stomach type pain), not heart pain. She came back to me for a hair transplant, but I did not like her doctor’s diagnosis since it sounded like classic angina (pain coming on with exertion, climbing stairs, and fast paced walking), so I sent her back to her doctor. Again, he reassured her that the pain was not cardiac in nature, as her ECG was normal. I then got into her medical care and called her doctor, suggesting that he perform a stress ECG. He told me that it was unnecessary and again insisted that the pain was not cardiac. This lady wanted a hair transplant and was unable to persuade her doctor to get further testing, so because her doctor had cleared her and she wanted to proceed, I transplanted her.

    During the surgery, she began experiencing chest pain, which I then treated with nitroglycerin, fortunately relieving her discomfort. This happened twice during the procedure. After surgery, I called her doctor and told him of the events at surgery. He saw her again after the transplant procedure and told her that she did not have cardiac pain and was upset with me for interfering with his medical care of her. I suggested to her that she see another doctor for a second opinion, but she liked her doctor and wanted to stay with his opinion. Three weeks after the surgery, she had a heart attack, and fortunately for her, she survived.

    Being right is not a consolation from my point of view. We know from the anesthesia literature, that for people with heart disease and outpatient surgery, the risk of a heart attack in the 30 days after the surgery is higher than in the average person without surgery. Undergoing any surgery is no small matter and although I have never experienced any cardiac problems with my patients that I could not manage in surgery, risk clearance for anyone over the age of 45 years old, a good and thorough physical examination should be a medically necessity. We must all be on guard for detecting heart disease early and there are many good ways to do this today. The sad reality, however, is that in nearly 50% of cases, the first sign of heart disease is death.

    Tags: hairloss, hair loss, chest, pain, indigestion, outpatient, surgery, heart attack, heart disease, disease, procedure, transplant

    My Hair System Cost Me Over $16,000 In 5 Years!

    Sep 7, 2007/by William Rassman, M.D./0 /Favorites, Hair Pieces / Systems

    HaircutI received this email from a patient of mine and I have reposted it below with his permission (removing any identifying information, of course). This was not solicited, and it serves as an example of those men out there that are looking into hair systems (otherwise known as wigs or toupees). The price chart at the end of this post could be a wake-up call to many that think hair systems are cheaper than hair transplants.

    In the end, transplanted hair is YOUR hair and the only maintenance you might need to do for it is to use shampoo and perhaps even use a comb. Oh, and visit a barber from time to time, if you’d like. You know, the things you did when you had hair the first time.

    And now, the patient email…

    Dr. Rassman:

    As usual, it was good to meet with you to discuss my case. It is amazing that what we (operative word here) will accomplish in 21 months negates over 13 years of living with worry and dread about my hair loss! On some level I am certain you understand the value of your work; on the other hand, it is impossible for you to fully comprehend what you and your great staff at NHI have done for me and your other patients!

    Here is a breakdown of my costs from a hair replacement salon in Los Angeles from June 2000 through January 2006. I wore a competing hair system from 1995 through 2000, but did not keep thorough records of those costs. Therefore, the $16,000+ indicated on the spreadsheet does NOT include the previous five years, so the total amount I spent on hair systems is actually higher that what my spreadsheet shows. In fact, I am certain I spent more on hair “replacement” than what I will spend on 5000+ transplants with NHI.

    To be fair when you reprint this spreadsheet, post the the following as well:

    1. This spreadsheet is ONE PERSON’S experience with hair systems. It was my reality and should be viewed as such. Your costs will vary from my mine.
    2. The price for a hair system included two of them: wear one while the other gets service or cleaned.
    3. The months where there is no dollar amount were the times I did not go to the salon for servicing.
    4. I work in an industry that required my systems to look absolutely real at all times. The months where you see me spending $200-$400 were instances when the unit had to be colored or have hair added. Again, in my case it was a necessity. If you are in, say, another profession like a machinist, you may not have to obsess over your hair system. You WILL have maintenance, though, perhaps not as much. Also, to be fair, some people do most of their own maintenance, so their costs would be lower as well.
    5. In June 2000 the systems were just over $3000. Flash forward to 2004 and they were over $5000. I got 4 years use out of mine before they were replaced, and that was on the higher end of the average life cycle because of my meticulous maintenance. They might have had to be replaced before that if I did not treat them so well.

    I wonder what systems cost today in 2007?

    Bottom line: I spent $16,000+ over five years wearing hair. Sure, the initial costs for systems were cheaper than surgery, but their VALUE quickly fades over time. It costs more upfront for a high quality transplant, but its VALUE over the course of your lifetime is incalculable.

    Thanks again for everything. Looking forward to my next transplant session.

    Here’s the spreadsheet he sent me with the costs incurred for purchasing and maintaining his hairpieces.

    Hair System Costs By Month

    2000 2001 2002
    Jul $3031.00 *
    Aug $65.73
    Sep $199.80
    Oct $95.00
    Nov $120.72
    Dec $139.38
     
    * Initial cost for 2 systems
    Jan $135.14
    Feb $125.00
    Mar $91.73
    Apr $110.06
    May $402.52
    Jun $13.50
    Jul $145.59
    Aug $179.42
    Sep $113.70
    Oct $197.80
    Nov $91.20
    Dec $270.00
    Jan $258.69
    Feb $153.07
    Mar $156.21
    Apr $103.49
    May —
    Jun —
    Jul $175.93
    Aug $162.62
    Sep —
    Oct $131.90
    Nov —
    Dec —
    2003 2004 2005
    Jan $101.12
    Feb $105.00
    Mar —
    Apr $146.25
    May $183.27
    Jun —
    Jul $87.86
    Aug $138.69
    Sep —
    Oct $176.39
    Nov —
    Dec $282.35
    Jan $204.58
    Feb —
    Mar $172.63
    Mar $2796.00 **
    Apr $142.64
    May $2589.06 ***
    Jun —
    Jul $216.69
    Aug $233.68
    Sep $272.27
    Oct $131.00
    Nov $130.84
    Dec $120.26
    ** 1/2 Deposit on a new system
    *** Remaining balance on new system
    Jan $240.89
    Feb $120.98
    Mar —
    Apr $112.00
    Apr $128.05
    May $78.50
    Jun $155.29
    Jul —
    Aug —
    Sep $113.41
    Oct $209.50
    Nov $99.50
    Dec —
    2006 Grand Total (after only 5.5 years)
    Jan $99.50
    $16,257.40

     

    Hair Stem Cell: Production of Nerve Vessels and Hair Multiplication

    Aug 31, 2007/by William Rassman, M.D./1 /Favorites, Hair Cloning

    MouseLast week we attended a lecture at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles on the topic of hair stem cells. Dr. Robert Hoffman (speaker) is a professor at the University of California, San Diego. He and his colleagues have done several studies on hair stem cells and its application in different fields of medicine.

    Dr. Hoffman’s team extracted special cells from the bulge area of hair follicles (above the lower generative center of hair) that are known to be easily accessible and a good source of actively growing, pluripotent cells (cells that have capability of differentiating to different cell lines). They found the protein markers of the neural stem cells in this group of cells (Nestin). They performed several projects to evaluate the final cell lines that could be harvested from growth and differentiation of these stem cells. Among those were using these cells to produce nervous system and blood vessel cells. In one study, Dr. Hoffman’s team applied these stem cells on mouse severed sciatic nerve. The animals that were treated have recovered from nerve injury and could resume the function of affected limb faster in comparison to the control group that never received any treatments.

    Dr. Hoffman and his colleagues also performed similar study on a mouse with spinal cord injury. The animal with spinal cord injury gained the function of its paralyzed limb following application of these cells to transected part of spinal cord. The findings can bring about hope for treatment of patients with ‘fresh’ spinal cord injuries. Currently, there is no effective treatment for spinal cord injury and those patients are doomed to lose the neural function of some part of their body, commonly their lower extremities for the rest of their lives.

    Although Dr. Hoffman was optimistic about application of hair stem cells in regeneration of cells in nervous system, when asked about his opinion on hair multiplication, he did not believe that it would be that easy. Dr. Hoffman believes that the necessity of interaction of this dual stem cell system (cells from bulge area and cells from dermal papilla of hair follicles that produce hair formation) makes it more complicated for producing hair with a method similar to what is described (in producing nervous system or blood vessel cells).

    It is most interesting that Dr. Hoffman and many others working in this arena, find that producing the hair organ (which contains skin, hair elements, blood vessels, fat, and other supportive tissues) is far more difficult than producing just one of these elements (nerves, blood vessels). For those of you who are anxiously waiting for hair multiplication results to be available in the clinical world, I would not postpone the more standard treatment for hair loss (e.g hair transplantation), as your balding will inevitably progress as you will wait, and wait, and wait for the breakthrough that may not occur in the time frame when you can enjoy having hair on your head.

    Tags: stem cell, stemcell, hair multiplication, cloning, hair cloning, spinal cord, hoffman

    The Value of Experience in Hair Transplant and Prostate Surgery

    Aug 31, 2007/by William Rassman, M.D./0 /Favorites, Hair Transplantation, Other Surgical Procedures

    Da Vinci RobotMy first cousin just had a diagnosis of prostate cancer. With my help, we explored his options. He is 67 years young and his father lived to 96, and many on both sides of his family lived into their 90s and 100s. This is important, because the decision on which treatment to take for the cancer depends upon your life expectancy. Many men over 70 are pointed to non-surgical treatments, because their life expectancy is in the 10 year range so the value of surgery over radiation (radioactive seeds) or “watchful waiting” is not clearly defined compared to the risks of surgery. You don’t want your surgeon to use actuarial tables alone in deciding whether surgery is right for you.

    In my cousin’s case, we selected a radical prostatectomy with a new technique using the da Vinci robot directed surgery. The surgeon does surgery from another room, all through the use of telemetry and robotics. The surgeon most skilled in this technique is Mani Menon, MD, based at the Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit (my cousin flew from Washington DC for the surgery and will fly back out for the post surgery follow-up). Dr. Menon has personally done over 2,000 such surgeries and his complication rate is the lowest in the world. His extensive pioneering research and experience on nerve sparing techniques results in a lower incidence of complications, such as erectile dysfunction (ED), in particular, and incontinence. My cousin could have had the surgery done locally at much less cost with surgeons who had some experience (20 – 200 surgeries) with the robot. There is no substitute for experience. For more information on the da Vinci surgical robot, see DaVinciProstatectomy.com

    He just had the prostate surgery yesterday and said it was easy with no pain. He thought that the entire process was first class. Of interest, his older brother had the same surgery with a local doctor just a few weeks before and did not have as smooth a course with the surgery. I don’t know and can not say that this is an apples to apples comparison, but my cousin thinks it is. He is now 24 hours from his surgery and is already walking around and being discharged from the hospital as I write this blog. Had finasteride been around for 20 years and had he taken it, it may have reduced his risk for developing prostate cancer (better than a slick surgery, of course).

    What does this have to do with hair transplantation? Unfortunately, hair transplant surgery is fast becoming a commodity as more and more doctors enter the business and drop prices to lure patients into their practices. If you were my cousin, would you accept a discount from a local, less experienced surgeon rather than pay higher fees and endure travel expenses and associated inconveniences? Does it pay to travel to get the surgeons who are the leaders in the field? My cousin thought that some years ago when he traveled cross country to California to have his hair transplant surgeries done at NHI.

    Here are some questions you should ask yourself when choosing your hair transplant surgeon:

    1. What are the complications that one can experience from doctors who do not have experienced teams performing this type of surgery?
    2. Do you really know what you are getting and what you are paying for?
    3. Are the graft counts accurate?
    4. Do the doctors maintain a high standard on quality control while performing these surgeries?
    5. How many surgeons have you met with that show the results of the ‘local’ doctor’s surgery? It is better than seeing some of their “failures” walking around the city.
    6. Do you have the discipline that my cousin had to ensure that the surgeon that you select will do the best job the first time around? Unlike prostate surgery you never see the patient’s incontinence or impotence, but on a poorly done hair transplant, you have to face it in the mirror every day and if it is bad enough, so will everyone else (and few will tell you what they see).

    Case in point, I just met with a patient who had a terrible hair transplant. I asked him about the doctor who did it and he told me that the plastic surgeon who did the procedure was a relative of his and was willing to do the transplant at no cost to him. He thought he got the deal of a lifetime. This is a family connection that is now in trouble. Some plastic surgeons who do not have substantial training in hair transplantation and do not have an experienced team working with them, will fail at getting the results that are possible. There are no real bargains out there, and often, the old saying ‘that you get what you pay for’ is hard to learn.

    Tags: prostate, davinci, da vinci, robot, prostatectomy, menon, nhi, hairtransplant, hair transplant, surgery, surgeon, hairloss, hair loss

    Female Genetic Hair Loss Is Different From Male Genetic Hair Loss

    Aug 17, 2007/by William Rassman, M.D./1 /Favorites, Female Hair Loss

    I am a 52 year old woman with thinning hair since I was 30. I died my hair blonde and it seemed to cover the thinning. Now it is clearly getting worse and I can see through the hair to my scalp and even the blonde color does not help. In fact, the scalp really stands out. Is there something wrong with me?

    The cause of hair loss in women is not as straight forward as it is in men, who usually follow a specific male pattern balding. Male pattern balding involves hair loss only on the front, top, and crown of the scalp. Male pattern balding spares the hair in the back and sides of the scalp, which is often referred to as permanent hair. This is the area where hair is harvested for hair transplantation.

    Unlike men, adult women with typical female androgenic alopecia often have significant levels of miniaturization in the donor area (back of the scalp). Miniaturization is part of the balding process where hair shafts become thinner over time before falling out. The mere presence of miniaturization is not necessarily a contraindication to surgery. However, miniaturization does indicate an unstable donor supply and one has to make a judgment regarding the risk/reward of the procedure. One needs to consider the absolute number of full terminal hairs that are available for the hair transplant, the risk of further miniaturization, the area that needs to be covered, and the risk of the surgery accelerating the hair loss (since in women, hair is often transplanted into an area that has a considerable amount of existing hair –- some of which is at risk of being shed from the surgery).

    Before further discussing the phenomenon of clinical (“socially” visible) hair loss, here are a few basic facts for your general knowledge. It is normal to lose 100 to even 150 hairs a day. As hair falls out there are hairs that are also starting to grow. Hair may also grow in cycles and you may notice more hair falling out at different phases and seasons of the year. Hair follicle cells have three phases of growth:

    1. Growth phase (Anagen phase) which lasts anywhere from 2 to 6 years. This is the phase where your hair is actively growing at approximately 10cm per year. 85% of hair is at this phase at any given time.
    2. Transitional phase (Catagen phase) which lasts about 2 weeks. This is the phase where the hair follicle shrinks and prepares to enter the resting phase.
    3. Resting phase (Telogen phase) which lasts about 1-6 months. This is the phase where hair does not grow, but stays attached to the follicle. Some hairs are shed at this phase, but at the end the hair follicle re-enters the growth phase to start the cycle over again. 10-15% of hairs are at this phase at any given time.

    The first step in evaluating hair loss in women, after a detailed history and physical exam, is to rule out any underlying medical causes of hair loss which can be treated. If clinically appropriate, the following disease processes should be considered: anemia, thyroid disease, connective tissue disease, gynecological conditions and emotional stress. Furthermore, over 50% of women going through change of life hormone fluctuations (menopause) experience significant hair loss. It is also important to review the use of medications that may cause hair loss, such as (but not limited to) oral contraceptives, beta-blockers, Vitamin A, thyroid drugs, coumadin, and prednisone. The following laboratory tests have been recommended to rule out the aforementioned medical conditions:

    Some common blood tests for female hair loss:

    • Sex Hormone tests
    • SHBG (Sex Hormone Binding Globulin) used to test status of male hormones
    • Estradiol is a sex hormone
    • FSH (Follicle Stimulating Hormone) *not hair follicle but follicle in the ovary*
    • LH (Luteinizing Hormone) is a sex hormone
    • Free Testosterone
    • Total Testosterone
    • ANA (Anti Nuclear Antibody) used to test for Lupus or other autoimmune diseases
    • TSH (Thyroid Stimulating Hormone) used to test for hyper or hypo-thyroid disease
    • Test Iron status
    • TIBC (Total Iron Binding Capacity)
    • Ferritin
    • Iron

    These laboratory tests are a good starting point to medically rule out underlying medical conditions. If there is an abnormality in your test results, we can proceed to address these medical issues. It is important to note that even after a medical condition has been corrected, your hair loss may still persist to some degree. It is thought that this is due to a “switch” in your genetic makeup that has been turned on when the medical insult had occurred. Once the hair loss starts, it is difficult to turn off this “switch”. At the very least, your hair loss may slow down and your medical condition addressed.

    The only medicine that seems to work for women (who do not have a medical cause of the thinning or hair loss) is minoxidil.

    Now with all of what I said above, there is a small subset of women who have what appears to be the ‘male’ form of alopecia with front to back balding and no miniaturization in the donor area. These women may be helped by Propecia and certainly get the types of excellent results from frontal hair transplants.

    Tags: women, woman, female, hairloss, hair loss, minoxidil, tests, genetics, genetic
    123
    Older Entries
    Page 1 of 6

    Videos

    Podcasts

    Ask Dr. Rassman

    * Your questions may be published (without your contact information).

    [contact-form-7 id=”27935″ title=”Sidebar Contact”]

    Over 21 million women and 35 million men in America suffer from hair loss. For many of these people, the psychological impact on their life is debilitating.

    Dr. Rassman is a world leading expert in hair loss with over 25 years of experience and over 50,000 satisfied clients.

    About

    This site exists to educate about hair loss and hair restoration.

    William R. Rassman, M.D.

    Categories

    • ACell
    • African American
    • Age
    • April Fools
    • Density
    • Diseases
    • Drugs
    • Drugs (Cause Hair Loss)
    • Favorites
    • Female Hair Loss
    • FUE
    • Hair Cloning
    • Hair Loss Causes
    • Hair Pieces / Systems
    • Hair Products
    • Hair Transplantation
    • Hairlines
    • Megasession
    • Other
    • Other Surgical Procedures
    • Personal Stories
    • Photos
    • Pigments
    • Podcasts
    • Post-Operative
    • Repair
    • Repost
    • Scalp MicroPigmentation
    • Scarring
    • Thinning
    • Tidbits
    • Training
    • Videos

    Archives

    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005
    • June 2005
    • May 2005
    • April 2005
    • June 202
    • May 202

    Links

    Disclaimer

    This site is intended to educate the public on hair loss topics based on personal experience and opinions from Dr. William Rassman and contributing physician editors. Information provided on BaldingBlog.com should not be used for the purpose of medical diagnosis or treatment.

    Scroll to top