Why Did I Create This Blog?

I was wondering why you are running this baldingblog.com site rather than participating in one or more of the many chat groups on the internet?

The chat groups have a scattered agenda. Many are using it as a magnet for doctor advertising, charging doctors a fee for participation and favoring those that participate. Some of these sites have a combination of content focused on hair loss and chat activities. These sites are frequented by many of the same people who dominate the chat agenda, so it is less focused upon subject content and more focused upon selling something. With the anonimity of the internet, you can not always be sure which of the posters are honestly trying to help and which are trying to line their own pockets. Some of these sites thrive on things that go wrong. In our practice, things rarely go wrong, so a site that focused on the exceptions rather than the rule, gives a false impression of the process to the new inquirer who wants to learn about the reality of today’s modern hair transplant process. I have always liked to have free forums where new people can get answers without intimidation or salesmen hawking their every move. In my office, I started having open house events and hotel seminars 13 years ago with patient participation long before a hair transplant recipient ever came ‘out of the closet’ where he hid his hair transplants. We never used a salesmen anywhere in our business model. In those days, the ‘standard of care’ was the pluggy graft, so showing off a patient without plugs made our seminars and open house events very successful. Those who came, expected to see pluggy patients and what they saw were normal looking people where the hair transplant could not be seen. At these events, I always held an open forum, allowing interruptions as the audience fell into the tempo of the subject material and conversations. It was the audience that ran the ‘show’ not me. The BaldingBlog.com site allows the type of freedom that I have in our seminars and it put the agenda into the hands of the questioner. I am more a responsive participant as a content expert. I have had many emails that I do not put on the BaldingBlog because I am frequently responding to a follow-up question that may not have a public interest.

I have in the past experimented with participating in these chats, but many of the aggressive participants love to go after a doctor who is not paying his ‘right of way’ for immunity in the for-profit sites. Some of the comments have been tasteless. Hearsay comments dominate. If I go down in the mud with those that are hair obsessed or angry, I generally get frustrated. Arguing with an irrational person is akin to a Jerry Springer milieu rather than an educational and informative framework. The worst part of anonymous free speech is that some of these chat groups don’t care if any statement can’t be proved to be true. One can say that Dr. X is a murderer, a heartless transplant mutilator, a mercenary who is driven by the almighty dollar, and if there is no recourse to identify the person who sends out such comments, then you can not necessarily believe anything you read. I have seen people say that they have personally seen patients of Dr. X …. Or that they are a patient of Dr. X and certifies to the crime personally. Defending oneself from baseless attacks are pointless and a wasteful use of time. I would doubt that any of this audience would want to read the JerrySpringerBaldingBlog.