Dear Dr. Rassman,
Do you believe it should become standard practice for men to be checked for hair loss either by their primary care physician, a dermatologist or another type of doctor every two or so years between ages 18 and 40? This could be done with observation, hair bulk analysis or a miniaturization study.
We know that Propecia is a powerful medication for postponing and delaying hair loss, especially if used when a man still has a good bit of hair. But it seems the problem is that many men don’t realize they have hair loss until they’ve lost a lot of hair and it has become visibly apparent. Then they start researching what causes hair loss and maybe get on Propecia within a few weeks or months.
In my case, I noticed I was losing hair, mostly in the crown, at age 26. I was shocked to see how much I had already lost. I went for a study and it was confirmed. I’ve gone on Propecia and it’s done a reasonably good job preventing noticeable further loss.
But at age 24, or age 22, when my hair follicles started to shrink, it would have been great had it been standard practice for a physician to take five minutes to look for hair loss. I would have had the choice of getting on Propecia then and, hopefully, postponing my ultimate genetic fate that much longer. Or I could have observed more closely, and when I saw the hair loss was continuing, got on Propecia.
Your thoughts on making a hair loss exam as standard for men as a testicular exam?
Practically speaking, unless your health insurance pays primary doctors for hair loss exams, it will likely not be on the agenda. Hair loss is seen as a cosmetic issue and most doctors don’t know much about it. Perhaps if the majority of patients are willing to pay the doctor for a hair loss exam it would be more widely available.
We have many young men taking Propecia/finasteride, so obviously there are many that realize they are balding in time to do something about it. The internet really helps and it is free.
Tags: hairloss, hair loss, propecia, finasteride