Could FUE2 Replace the Strip Method? (Part 2)

This is Part 2 of 2. If you missed Part 1 from yesterday, that can be found here.

—

What is FUE2?

Ever since we announced the FUE2 technique a few months back, people have asked me how it is different from the traditional FUE procedure I invented and published in the medical journals back in 2002. The basic difference is the addition of a water jet for enhancing the dissection of the excised graft. The pressure of the water jet adds to creating a plane of dissection which produces clean grafts as good in most situations as strip harvested grafts (the golden standard for follicular unit transplants).

What is better, the strip or the FUE2? First lets assume that the FUE2 produces comparable quality grafts to the strip harvesting method. When the donor density is low, the missing follicular units from FUE2 become obvious when the hair is cut short. There can be a moth eaten look in these low density people. In high density people, the FUE does not show up so there is generally not a moth eaten appearance, but the many white dots created by the FUE scar can be seen and this will absolutely limit a shaved head. When a strip is performed and a good wide lower trichophytic closure is created, the scar is less in most patients than any scar from FUE. The problem is that most FUE doctors have created illusions around what they do and produce hype that will never be substantiated in most patients, particularly those with low to average densities and a high number of FUE grafts. I always tell the patient that I get 50% more $$$ for an FUE procedure (graft for graft), so if I recommend the strip as a viable alternative, it is clearly not a financial issue for me. The results of the evolution in my thinking is based upon following many patients (mine and other doctor’s patients) with regard to scarring.

THE FUE2 is a better procedure than the standard FUE, but not better with regard to strip harvesting in quantity and quality. FUE fails to grow at the 90% plus rate much of the time in most doctor’s hands, but strip grafts do not. I am afraid to tell you that honest doctors who do FUE are few and far between, but they do exist. With our FUE2 procedure, we clearly can do it better than most doctors. And as our survival rate following FUE2 is comparable to strip harvesting and significantly better than traditional FUE, the choice with us is clearly in the hands of the patient. I try to present a balanced approach in the analysis when patients come to my office and ask about FUE.