FUE vs Hair Multiplication
Sorry to bother you about my small scar again, but I have been doing a lot of research about Follicular Multiplication, and I have read that it is a lot like FUE, except they do not extract the whole follicle.(So the extracted hair will grow back). I was just wondering if that might be an option for me, becuase I have a very small scar on my scalp, and I would really like to fill it in with a small hair transplant, but I am afraid that the transplant will cause more damage to my hair than the scar is to begin with.
I don’t know what to do, because it is so small, but it bothers me, and I would really just like to get it repaired, but I don’t want to cause any damage to the rest of my hair.
An FUE procedure will not damage your scalp or hair. Hair multiplication is experimental and probably will not work. There are a number of companies like Aderans and Intercytex trying to induce formation of new follicles. Most researchers would accept anything, whether it be follicular neogenesis or rejuvenation or stem cell yields, or anything that will make a new hair, any way it comes. Unfortunately, this technology is probably years away, still.
Why not just fix this small scar if it is so bothering and get it behind you?
Reader Comments0
Share this entry
Leave a Comment
Want to join the discussion? Feel free to contribute! Note: We do not tolerate offensive language or personal attacks to other readers. Marketing links or commercial advertisements will be deleted.