My Trichologist Said I’m Not Balding But Likely Will in the Future!
Hi doctor, I was involved in a car accident four years ago where amongst much more serious injuries I lost a section of hair at the back of my head approximately one inch long and half an inch wide. Because of this I had to visit a hair loss specialist local to me who is an expert in trichology, she thinks it is alopecia but this hasn’t got any worse over the four years post accident.
Any way my actual reason for messaging you is that I asked her if I was suffering from any kind of male pattern baldness and after being examined she said that I am not balding nor displaying any type of MPB at present but it in all probability it is extremely likely that I will later in life which concerns me. I am 25 years old, my father has a full head of hair at 55, his father died at 89 with a full head of hair and my father has 6 brothers with full heads of hair. My mothers father died at 40 with a full head of hair. My mothers brother is 55 with a full head of hair. The only bald male in my family tree to my knowledge is my mothers uncle.
If I have a full head of hair now at 25 with minimal balding family history how could she say that in all probability I will go bald later in life? I have always had very fine hair and quite a high hairline but this has been the case since I was a very young child. Please reply!
Regards
Maybe your trichologist has a side job of being a fortune teller. Ask her to pick the winning lottery numbers for you!
If you have hair loss from a serious injury following a car accident, this is obviously not genetic pattern baldness, particularly in the area you describe. Simply looking at family balding history isn’t a way to guarantee whether you’ll keep or lose your hair (it can skip generations)… but even if it was, it would look favorably to you since hair loss isn’t common in your lineage.
I have no idea how your trichologist came to that conclusion, but I’d probably meet with an actual doctor if you’re worried about this. Most trichologists are not physicians.
I second Dr. Rassman’s opinion