Value of HAIRCHECK instrument
Today I had an 18 year old man visit me worried about early frontal recession. My eyes told me that he was developing a maturing hairline and not balding. So to confirm my suspicions, I ran a HAIRCHECK test on him. What I found was an unusual reading, where the hair which we measured in the back of the head (donor area) had less bulk than the front, top and crown areas. This perplexed me, so we discussed his hair hygiene today. He told me that although he washed his hair with water this morning, he put shampoo selectively only on the back of his head hair to get out the oily feel in the back of the head. This caused a reduction of bulk by about 40% which I attributed to the removal of oil in the hair in the donor area but not \in front, top and crown, area.
I was impressed that the measurements I took were able to detect the differences in the way he washed parts of his head. Imagine what it will do for you if you find yourself concerned about balding. This is the MOST sensitive test for balding on the market available anywhere.
So, removal of oil – at least in this patient – reduced the bulk of a hair by 60%? If that is the case, how can “thinning” be determined by an instrument if the difference between “100%” and “60%” can be affected by something as simple as shampooing? Or is the goal not to measure the actual diameter of the hair but the difference between the front and areas in the “safe” zone in the back of the head? if the latter, then I think understand. If the former, I’m very confused!
It is very useful to know about value of hair check instrument and it can available in market.
I was impressed that the measurements I took were able to detect the differences in the way he washed parts of his head. Imagine what it will do for you if you find yourself concerned about balding. This is the MOST sensitive test for balding on the market available anywhere.
It is very good news until now there is no instrument to check hair but now it is very easy to check hair value.