• Facebook
WRassman,M.D. BaldingBlog
  • Menu

Long term finasteride use (extracted from today’s Reddit.com)

Jul 28, 2020/by William Rassman, M.D./0 /Hair Loss Causes

This is an extremely complete assessment of the long term use of this controversial drug. The writer concludes that adding minoxidil and microneedling will increase the benefit and I agree with that conclusion.

Information on Finasteride Dosage and Long term Efficiency

Hi everyone I previously made a post about the ultimate hair loss protocol, the post consisted of the best treatments of hair loss and mainly debunking some finasteride risks. However today I will be discussing finasteride importance in people’s protocol, dosages, and long term efficiency. Before I get into the niddy griddy lets get one quick point out of the way

  1. For the vast majority of people, testosterone levels in the normal range (400-1100ng/dl) will have very minimal effect on hair loss, and there have been some theories and studies going around that having optimal T levels in the natural range, Optimal T/DHT ratios, and nonexcessive body fat, can help hair loss. Most people PRONE TO HAIR LOSS will probably lose hair quicker when being high body fat and low t levels, then compared to if they were a lower body fat (under 18%), and high natural range T levels. Now don’t misinterpret what I am saying, thinking becoming healthier will cure hair loss, or help it in an extreme way. Nope, there is gonna be a guy out there 300 pounds eating burgers all day and will have a NW 1 at 50, it’s genetics my friends, other then a few rare deficiency and hair thinning from hyperthyroid, almost all your hair loss is from your genetic makeup, specifically, your scalp sensitivity to DHT. Dereck from MPMD did an experiment before bringing his t levels to 2000 ng/dl and using dutasteride, he reported experiencing hair loss, ( didn’t, seem to be extremely noticeable), however, all his experiment really proved was that testosterone above the natural range can cause hair loss, but most of us will not be having our T levels that high.

Now let’s begin with finasteride.

https://preview.redd.it/eh5l730uafd51.png?width=841&format=png&auto=webp&s=456aff6a2c99eb95bb20c14063821875f3bc4054

As you can see above is the 5 year study of finasteride 1mg a day consisting of 4 different groups. Some interesting things to notice

  1. The placebo group demonstrated an increased rate of hair loss from year to year, playing into the theory that our androgen sensitivity goes up as we get older, or something else that is causing an increased rate of hair loss each year.
  2. The validity of the statement that starting finasteride earlier is clearly shown above, showing that starting a finasteride year later, did not catch up to the group that was finasteride the entire time. BASICALLY START FIN NOW THEN LATER.
  3. The group that went off finasteride after one year, went down to the same spot as the placebo group after one year. However, after going back on finasteride, the group reached to almost the same position as the group that was on finasteride for the entire study. So it seems the reports that taking a break from finasteride after using it for seemingly a year or above, will not hurt your gains to a noticeable degree and possibly changing some factors to your scalp which are the slightly permanent or delayed benefit after stopping use of finasteride.

Now based on the people on finasteride for all 5 years, we can use simple math to predict long term efficiency of finasteride, which can also be back up with a study that I will demonstrate after.

So we will take the highest finasteride hair count, which is after one year on average. Based on multiple studies I took the average hair count after one year to be (80) on 1mg per day, also using this number to be conservative. We know the hair count change from baseline after 5 years was (38), So using these two points including the years we can create a formula to calculate the efficiency of finasteride. Again note this is just an estimate

(1,80), (5,38)

y= -10.5(x) + 90.5 *x is the year on finasteride and calculation result is hair count, estimate not exact

So based on this formula using the data above after 10 years we can estimate that the average man on only finasteride will be -14.5 below the baseline. Again you may be higher, while some are lower, that is just the average. Now compare this to the placebo group which the information found online the average loss after a year from baseline is -15 (imagine 10 years on finasteride is equivalent to one-year placebo for the average man….crazy), now after 5 years the placebo group was -239 below baseline, so again let’s do some calculations.

(1,-15),(5,-239)

y= -56(x) + 41

That means after 10 years of no finasteride the average hair count is a staggering -519 below the baseline.

The group starting finasteride after one year of being in the placebo group.

(1,50), (5,4)

y= -11.5(x) + 61.5

For this group after 10 years we have a hair count of – 53.5, this is equivalent to about two years without finasteride in the placebo group.

Again above is considered a worst-case scenario since two studies have been published on finasteride, with the duration of finasteride use being 10 years, demonstrating that finasteride either increased or stabilized hair count in 86-91% of patients. So the calculation above should really be giving you the worst case result, which is still great, showing finasteride being great for stabilizing hair loss for many years. Also consider this is just finasteride, no minoxidil, dermarolling, alfatradiol, RU, and CB.

Now for finasteride dosage.

Fuck the dosage curve. yes, the one I am showing you below,

https://preview.redd.it/jfzx3tbwafd51.png?width=622&format=png&auto=webp&s=a6c9e33255b487d796357e287b9546eff492780b

This graph tells me absolutely nothing, just how much DHT is being inhibited, great, but what you and I care about is hair growth, stabilization, cost, and side effect free profile.

Based on this graph it should make no sense why lower dosages work for some people, in terms of side effects being alleviated.

Based on hair count after one year

https://preview.redd.it/cjyngqaxafd51.png?width=505&format=png&auto=webp&s=6683b30eeb9418a005805fc6e9b10b4ac57cbf18

1mg inhibits exactly the same amount of DHT as 5 mg yet 1 mg is 80-90% (Based on a couple of studies). 5mg is shown to have a higher side effect profile compared to 1 mg, even though they inhibit the same amount of DHT. 0.2 mg daily is 80% as effective a 1 mg, yet it only inhibits 3-7% less DHT. So again DHT levels do not seem to matter in terms of side effects and efficiency, or they are not entirely correlated. So many people on the site are wondering what the most cost-effective dose as well as side effect free profile. Well for starters we want to at least take finasteride on a regular basis meaning every day, every other day, or 3 x a week. So assuming 1 mg is the gold standard lets calculate using the info of 0.2 vs 1 mg hair count. We will use the total weekly amount of each so 7 mg a week vs 1.4 mg per week.

(1.4,61), (7,77)

y= 2.86(x) + 57 (x being the weekly dosage)

So if you take 1 mg (3x a week) that would mean your hair count would be 65, then there is 1.25mg 3 times a week will give you a hair count is 68. So you get the point, there are diminishing terms. In technical-scientific terms no 3 x 1mg a week is not as good a 1mg daily, however the difference is minimal, and if lowering your dosage allows you to take finasteride side effect free, which seems to be dose-dependent, please lower your dosage, knowing that finasteride is used for stabilization and that using things like minoxidil and derma rolling should be used for major hair regrowth.

Hope you enjoyed the post. Have a good day

The actual text with good graphics can be found here:  https://www.reddit.com/r/tressless/comments/hyv2fg/information_on_finasteride_dosage_and_long_term/

https://baldingblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/logo-small-300x62.png 0 0 William Rassman, M.D. https://baldingblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/logo-small-300x62.png William Rassman, M.D.2020-07-28 04:10:542020-07-28 04:18:13Long term finasteride use (extracted from today's Reddit.com)

You might also like

What is the Cause for My Female Hair Loss?
Could Putting On / Taking Off Hat Over and Over Cause Hair Loss?
I Have Had Insane Regrowth from Finasteride
I am 23 and have a poor sex drive and a poor erection. I am also losing…
Saw Palmetto and finasteride together, is it better?
Advertisement says: "Soon There Will Be Unlimited Hair"
Get a virtual consultation with Dr. William Rassman and Dr. Jae Pak for hair loss options. You can learn more by scheduling an appointment.

Reader Comments0

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share by Mail
Newer Entries Older Entries

Leave a Comment

Want to join the discussion? Feel free to contribute! Note: We do not tolerate offensive language or personal attacks to other readers. Marketing links or commercial advertisements will be deleted.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

( Will not be published )

+ =

Videos

Podcasts

Ask Dr. Rassman

* Your questions may be published (without your contact information).

Over 21 million women and 35 million men in America suffer from hair loss. For many of these people, the psychological impact on their life is debilitating.

Dr. Rassman is a world leading expert in hair loss with over 25 years of experience and over 50,000 satisfied clients.

About

This site exists to educate about hair loss and hair restoration. Real answers from real physicians… daily.

William R. Rassman, M.D.

Categories

  • ACell (41)
  • African American (145)
  • Age (623)
  • April Fools (3)
  • Density (69)
  • Diseases (545)
  • Drugs (4,035)
  • Drugs (Cause Hair Loss) (535)
  • Favorites (89)
  • Female Hair Loss (1,075)
  • FUE (364)
  • Hair Cloning (178)
  • Hair Loss Causes (7,264)
  • Hair Pieces / Systems (115)
  • Hair Products (1,085)
  • Hair Transplantation (2,059)
  • Hairlines (467)
  • Megasession (15)
  • Other (1,254)
  • Other Surgical Procedures (249)
  • Personal Stories (14)
  • Photos (216)
  • Pigments (128)
  • Podcasts (1)
  • Post-Operative (611)
  • Repair (182)
  • Repost (10)
  • Scalp MicroPigmentation (11)
  • Scarring (346)
  • Thinning (7)
  • Tidbits (34)
  • Training (173)
  • Videos (58)

Archives

  • April 2021 (46)
  • March 2021 (85)
  • February 2021 (70)
  • January 2021 (65)
  • December 2020 (80)
  • November 2020 (76)
  • October 2020 (80)
  • September 2020 (106)
  • August 2020 (96)
  • July 2020 (95)
  • June 2020 (84)
  • May 2020 (83)
  • April 2020 (118)
  • March 2020 (106)
  • February 2020 (96)
  • January 2020 (104)
  • December 2019 (103)
  • November 2019 (71)
  • October 2019 (85)
  • September 2019 (76)
  • August 2019 (68)
  • July 2019 (64)
  • June 2019 (62)
  • May 2019 (59)
  • April 2019 (72)
  • March 2019 (53)
  • February 2019 (61)
  • January 2019 (65)
  • December 2018 (59)
  • November 2018 (42)
  • October 2018 (47)
  • September 2018 (64)
  • August 2018 (68)
  • July 2018 (62)
  • June 2018 (72)
  • May 2018 (68)
  • April 2018 (59)
  • March 2018 (65)
  • February 2018 (44)
  • January 2018 (57)
  • December 2017 (48)
  • November 2017 (37)
  • October 2017 (56)
  • September 2017 (68)
  • August 2017 (79)
  • July 2017 (70)
  • June 2017 (82)
  • May 2017 (98)
  • April 2017 (49)
  • March 2017 (25)
  • February 2017 (42)
  • January 2017 (74)
  • December 2016 (10)
  • November 2016 (3)
  • October 2016 (8)
  • June 2016 (2)
  • May 2016 (1)
  • April 2016 (9)
  • March 2016 (6)
  • February 2016 (4)
  • January 2016 (6)
  • December 2015 (7)
  • November 2015 (9)
  • October 2015 (13)
  • September 2015 (15)
  • August 2015 (24)
  • July 2015 (17)
  • June 2015 (19)
  • May 2015 (21)
  • April 2015 (27)
  • March 2015 (42)
  • February 2015 (41)
  • January 2015 (39)
  • December 2014 (45)
  • November 2014 (45)
  • October 2014 (65)
  • September 2014 (60)
  • August 2014 (62)
  • July 2014 (73)
  • June 2014 (49)
  • May 2014 (59)
  • April 2014 (57)
  • March 2014 (59)
  • February 2014 (60)
  • January 2014 (63)
  • December 2013 (53)
  • November 2013 (55)
  • October 2013 (69)
  • September 2013 (61)
  • August 2013 (66)
  • July 2013 (64)
  • June 2013 (60)
  • May 2013 (67)
  • April 2013 (66)
  • March 2013 (63)
  • February 2013 (59)
  • January 2013 (66)
  • December 2012 (59)
  • November 2012 (74)
  • October 2012 (86)
  • September 2012 (72)
  • August 2012 (88)
  • July 2012 (80)
  • June 2012 (80)
  • May 2012 (83)
  • April 2012 (79)
  • March 2012 (78)
  • February 2012 (80)
  • January 2012 (77)
  • December 2011 (75)
  • November 2011 (75)
  • October 2011 (78)
  • September 2011 (78)
  • August 2011 (92)
  • July 2011 (81)
  • June 2011 (88)
  • May 2011 (86)
  • April 2011 (84)
  • March 2011 (91)
  • February 2011 (68)
  • January 2011 (83)
  • December 2010 (82)
  • November 2010 (82)
  • October 2010 (85)
  • September 2010 (86)
  • August 2010 (88)
  • July 2010 (85)
  • June 2010 (89)
  • May 2010 (87)
  • April 2010 (110)
  • March 2010 (114)
  • February 2010 (99)
  • January 2010 (100)
  • December 2009 (97)
  • November 2009 (96)
  • October 2009 (109)
  • September 2009 (106)
  • August 2009 (105)
  • July 2009 (121)
  • June 2009 (132)
  • May 2009 (120)
  • April 2009 (132)
  • March 2009 (132)
  • February 2009 (136)
  • January 2009 (141)
  • December 2008 (142)
  • November 2008 (128)
  • October 2008 (160)
  • September 2008 (146)
  • August 2008 (148)
  • July 2008 (154)
  • June 2008 (146)
  • May 2008 (149)
  • April 2008 (154)
  • March 2008 (147)
  • February 2008 (148)
  • January 2008 (154)
  • December 2007 (127)
  • November 2007 (142)
  • October 2007 (161)
  • September 2007 (135)
  • August 2007 (160)
  • July 2007 (133)
  • June 2007 (141)
  • May 2007 (173)
  • April 2007 (170)
  • March 2007 (178)
  • February 2007 (161)
  • January 2007 (174)
  • December 2006 (132)
  • November 2006 (162)
  • October 2006 (179)
  • September 2006 (166)
  • August 2006 (188)
  • July 2006 (160)
  • June 2006 (179)
  • May 2006 (186)
  • April 2006 (172)
  • March 2006 (201)
  • February 2006 (175)
  • January 2006 (175)
  • December 2005 (179)
  • November 2005 (103)
  • October 2005 (74)
  • September 2005 (68)
  • August 2005 (79)
  • July 2005 (72)
  • June 2005 (69)
  • May 2005 (72)
  • April 2005 (41)

Links

Disclaimer

This site is intended to educate the public on hair loss topics based on personal experience and opinions from Dr. William Rassman and contributing physician editors. Information provided on BaldingBlog.com should not be used for the purpose of medical diagnosis or treatment.

© Copyright - WRassman,M.D. BaldingBlog - Enfold Theme by Kriesi
  • Facebook
Scroll to top